{
  "id": "team-b-review",
  "fictional": true,
  "methodId": "example-documentation-review",
  "methodVersion": "1.0.0",
  "scope": "Review of the seven retained files in this example, not every source linked by the wider case record.",
  "criteria": [
    {
      "id": "source-traceability",
      "rating": 1,
      "rationale": "The reviewed observation identifies these source digests, and this example retains the selected source bytes. This does not authenticate the original sources."
    },
    {
      "id": "specimen-identity",
      "rating": 1,
      "rationale": "The collection sheet and preparation protocol distinguish M-014, portions A and B, and analytical portion A1. The laboratory report assigns the copper result to A1."
    },
    {
      "id": "method-detail",
      "rating": 0,
      "rationale": "I rate the method detail as insufficient for this independent review. The narrative names a partial extraction but omits the operating procedure, recovery study and uncertainty budget needed to reconstruct the reported analysis."
    },
    {
      "id": "stated-limits",
      "rating": 1,
      "rationale": "The sources identify the unrecorded collection time, nominal masses, separate blank matrix, missing uncertainty budget and lack of a demonstrated link to the light."
    }
  ]
}