An official website of the Disclosure Foundation

Introduction

Overview

Modules

TaxonomyClassificationReference Systems

Guides

Claiming Origins

Reference Systems

Hynek, Vallée, AARO, and GEIPAN — institutional classification systems for historical interop

Decades of UAP data are already classified under other systems. The reference systems make those classifications first-class data so historical and institutional records can be ingested without losing their original coding.

They are deliberately off the root barrel — the core import surface of origins is the OCS taxonomy. Reach them via subpaths:

import { HYNEK_SYSTEM, HYNEK_CATEGORIES } from '@disclosureos/origins/reference/hynek';
import { VALLEE_BEHAVIORS, VALLEE_INTERACTIONS } from '@disclosureos/origins/reference/vallee';
import { AARO_SYSTEM, AARO_CATEGORIES } from '@disclosureos/origins/reference/aaro';
import { GEIPAN_SYSTEM, GEIPAN_CATEGORIES } from '@disclosureos/origins/reference/geipan';
// or everything: '@disclosureos/origins/reference'

Hynek

J. Allen Hynek's close-encounter scale, extended with the proposed CE4–CE7 categories:

CategoryLabel
NLNocturnal Light
DDDaylight Disc
RVRadar-Visual
CE1–CE7Close Encounters of the First through Seventh Kind
HYNEK_SYSTEM.RV;
// { category: 'RV', label: 'Radar-Visual',
//   description: 'Anomaly confirmed on radar and simultaneously by visual observation.' }

Vallée

Jacques Vallée's two-axis system: a behavior code (AN anomaly, FB flyby, MA maneuver, CE close encounter) crossed with an interaction level (1–5), plus the SVP credibility rating (source/site visit/possible-explanation digits).

import type { ValleeClassification, ValleeSVP } from '@disclosureos/origins/reference/vallee';

AARO

The Pentagon's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office resolution categories — the vocabulary modern U.S. government reporting resolves cases into:

airborne_clutter · natural_atmospheric · usg_industry · foreign_adversary · other_scientific_discovery

GEIPAN

The French space agency's case-classification grades — the longest-running official civilian UAP investigation:

A (identified) · B (probably identified) · C (insufficient data) · D1/D2 (unidentified after rigorous analysis), with strangeness/consistency ratings.

Relationship to the OCS

Reference classifications and OCS claims answer different questions:

  • Hynek/Vallée describe the phenomenology of the encounter (what kind of sighting it was) — not what caused it.
  • AARO/GEIPAN record an institutional resolution status.
  • The OCS organizes causal hypotheses with attributed confidence.

A record can carry all three: a Hynek RV coding from a 1960s catalog, a GEIPAN D1 status, and a modern OCS claim — none overwrites the others. Keep reference codings in your ingest mapping or the extensions bag, and express causal judgments as origin claims.

Classification

OriginClaim, hypothesis weights, and confidence distributions

Claiming Origins

The working guide: classify honestly, weight alternatives, and let disagreement stand

On this page

Hynek
Vallée
AARO
GEIPAN
Relationship to the OCS